Make (formerly Integromat) vs n8n: Comprehensive Comparison
Deciding between Make (formerly Integromat) and n8n? Here is a complete breakdown of features, pricing, pros, cons, and use cases to help you choose the right platform.
Executive Summary
When comparing Make (formerly Integromat) and n8n, the choice largely depends on your specific use case within the Workflow Automation space.
- Choose Make (formerly Integromat) if: technical operators building complex, branching automations.
- Choose n8n if: developers and privacy-conscious teams wanting self-hosted automation.
At a Glance Comparison
| Feature | Make (formerly Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Workflow Automation | Workflow Automation |
| Starting Price | Starts at $10.59/mo (Free tier available) | Open Source / Starts at €20/mo |
| Rating | 4.7 / 5.0 | 4.8 / 5.0 |
Make (formerly Integromat)
Make is a visual automation platform that lets you design, build, and automate anything from tasks to workflows to apps in minutes. It offers incredible flexibility for complex logic and data manipulation.
Pros
- Visual canvas is unmatched for complex branching
- Significantly cheaper than Zapier at scale
- Robust error handling and iterators
- Great for heavy API manipulation
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- UI can become cluttered on massive scenarios
- Some missing mainstream app integrations
n8n
n8n is an extendable workflow automation tool. With a fair-code distribution model, n8n will always have visible source code, be available to self-host, and allow you to add your own custom functions, logic and apps.
Pros
- Can be self-hosted for maximum data privacy
- Native support for AI agents and vector stores
- Extremely cost-effective
- You can write raw JavaScript/Python in nodes
Cons
- Requires technical knowledge to self-host and maintain
- Community nodes can sometimes break
- UI feels slightly more developer-focused than Make
Final Verdict
Both Make (formerly Integromat) and n8n offer robust solutions tailored to different aspects of AI capability building. If your goal is to technical operators building complex, branching automations, then Make (formerly Integromat) is the clear winner. However, if you are more focused on developers and privacy-conscious teams wanting self-hosted automation, n8n provides superior return on investment.
Reviewed by Revenue Institute
This guide is actively maintained and reviewed by the implementation experts at Revenue Institute. As the creators of The AI Workforce Playbook, we test and deploy these exact frameworks for professional services firms scaling without new headcount.
Revenue Institute
Need help turning this guide into reality? Revenue Institute builds and implements the AI workforce for professional services firms.